sinophone.world
Interface language · English

Works / Book

反離散：華語語系研究論

Sourced; not human-verified

Link to this record

Recorded first publication:

Other titles and cited translations

Topics: Sinophone

Versions and publications

Traditional Chinese · Original

Link to this record

Sourced; not human-verified · Status inherited from parent record

Sources, verification and open questions
Status
Sourced; not human-verified
Source check date
Source
Open questions
  • 導論〈華語語系的概念〉是否即 2011 年 PMLA 文章 The Concept of the Sinophone 的中译？题名吻合，但无来源明言，未建关系
  • 四篇附錄均已另立条目并以 part_of 相连；書中是否对期刊原版有增删（如附錄二的第二署名）待核书本身
Full version details
id
zh
Language
zh
Writing system
Hant
Type
original

Publication overview

聯經出版事業公司

· 327 頁

ISBN 9789570849493

Link to this record

Sourced; not human-verified

Sources, verification and open questions
Status
Sourced; not human-verified
Source check date
Source
Open questions
  • 頁數两说：出版社页面作 328 頁，联合目录作 327 面；按 DECISIONS #18 从权威档，出版社一说并留
Full version details
id
linking-2017
Publisher
聯經出版事業公司
Publication date
isbn13
9789570849493
Extent
327 頁
series
聯經文庫

Connections from other works

Only recorded relations are shown; arrows preserve their direction.

Critiques

這樣的「華語語系」論可以休矣！──史書美的「反離散」到底在反什麼?

Critiques → 反離散：華語語系研究論Traditional Chinese · Original

文中自述写作重点在于「對史氏的「華語語系」論做一個比較正式的回應」，并通篇驳斥其论点

Relation evidence
Status
Sourced; not human-verified
Source
https://storystudio.tw/article/sobooks/sinophone-literature-review/
Sources, verification and open questions
Status
Sourced; not human-verified
Source check date
Source
Open questions
  • 是否另有纸本首发处？网页未注明，注 [1] 只说明引号用法
西奴風與落花生：評史書美的「華語語系」概念

Critiques → 反離散：華語語系研究論Traditional Chinese · Original

黃茂善综述将本文列为对《反離散》的回应，称其「針對離散及史書美對中國的閱讀挖苦」

Relation evidence
Status
Sourced; not human-verified
Source
https://taiwanlit.org/essays/%E8%B7%A8%E6%99%82%E7%A9%BA%E7%B3%BE%E8%91%9B-%E8%8F%AF%E8%AA%9E%E8%AA%9E%E7%B3%BB%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E5%9C%A8%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E5%B0%8F%E5%8F%B2-2
Sources, verification and open questions
Status
Sourced; not human-verified
Source check date
Source
Open questions
  • 原刊未见：2026-09-27 以题名检索网络无结果，出版项只有此一处引注，待核原刊

Discusses

史书美“华语语系”文学辨析——以《反离散:华语语系研究论》为考察对象

Discusses → 反離散：華語語系研究論Traditional Chinese · Original

题名自言以《反離散》为考察对象

Relation evidence
Status
Sourced; not human-verified
Source
https://clc.shisu.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract101.shtml
Sources, verification and open questions
Status
Sourced; not human-verified
Source check date
Source
Open questions
  • 期刊官网题录已读；PDF 下载端点于 2026-09-28 返回 HTTP 403，尚未核对完整原刊版面，Expression 的 script 仍留 null。

Reviews

「反離散」的前傳、挑戰／釁與其外

Reviews → 反離散：華語語系研究論Traditional Chinese · Original

网站将本文标为「書評」；开篇即讨论《反離散》

Relation evidence
Status
Sourced; not human-verified
Source
https://storystudio.tw/article/sobooks/sinophone-literature-review-1/
Sources, verification and open questions
Status
Sourced; not human-verified
Source check date
Source
這樣的「華語語系」論可以休矣！──史書美的「反離散」到底在反什麼?

Reviews → 反離散：華語語系研究論Traditional Chinese · Original

网站将本文标为「書評」；文中说明未注出处的页码均出自《反離散》

Relation evidence
Status
Sourced; not human-verified
Source
https://storystudio.tw/article/sobooks/sinophone-literature-review/
Sources, verification and open questions
Status
Sourced; not human-verified
Source check date
Source
Open questions
  • 是否另有纸本首发处？网页未注明，注 [1] 只说明引号用法
評介《反離散：華語語系研究論》

Reviews → 反離散：華語語系研究論Traditional Chinese · Original

题名明言所评之书

Relation evidence
Status
Sourced; not human-verified
Source
https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail/a0000584-201904-201905020017-201905020017-113-115
Sources, verification and open questions
Status
Sourced; not human-verified
Source check date
Source

Included in

不斷去中心化的旅程──專訪史書美教授Traditional Chinese · Original ·

Included in → 反離散：華語語系研究論Traditional Chinese · Original ·

Relation evidence
Sources, verification and open questions
Status
Sourced; not human-verified
Source check date
Source
Open questions
  • 原发表处与年份待查：2026-09 检索华艺、月旦知识库与一般网络均未找到此文，疑为访谈原刊于非索引刊物或网络媒体
  • 是否为《反離散》首次发表？若是，本条目应只保留书中这一个 Manifestation

Sources and record details

Sources, verification and open questions
Status
Sourced; not human-verified
Source check date
Source
Open questions
  • 導論〈華語語系的概念〉是否即 2011 年 PMLA 文章 The Concept of the Sinophone 的中译？题名吻合，但无来源明言，未建关系
  • 四篇附錄均已另立条目并以 part_of 相连；書中是否对期刊原版有增删（如附錄二的第二署名）待核书本身
Complete metadata
id
反離散：華語語系研究論
Relation type
work
form
book
Titles and translated titles
  • Text
    反離散：華語語系研究論
    Language
    zh
    Writing system
    Hant
    Preferred name
    True
  • Text
    Against Diaspora: Discourse on the Sinophone
    Language
    en
    Type
    parallel_title
    Note
    UCLA 页面给出的英文题名；是否为书上印刷的并列题名待核
    Source
    https://global.ucla.edu/apc/person/52
Credits
First publication
Topic

Stable ID: work/shi-2017-fan-lisan · Data file: data/works/shi-2017-fan-lisan.yaml